Morality Without God Pages: In the end, through Frankenstein, Shelley concludes that moral and spiritual development can best be attained through the shedding of dogmatic belief structures, resulting in the elimination of God towards the attainment of self-realization.
Tap here to turn on desktop notifications to get the news sent straight to you.
I believe in the core stories of the gospel: Beyond that, here are a few random things about Christianity that not to put too pretentious a spin on it I hold to be self-evident: The Bible is a collection of a great many separate documents written by different people in different languages over thousands of years.
Properly understanding both the letter and spirit of the Bible necessarily entails taking into account the historical and cultural contexts that so greatly informs so much of its text.
The spirit of God is inerrant, while people -- even those impassioned by the conviction that God is speaking directly to or through them -- are not.
Others reference “common sense,” “logic” or a “lack of evidence” – or simply say they do not believe in God. But there are other reasons people give for leaving behind their childhood religion. One-in-five express an opposition to organized religion in general. The creature develops his own sense of morality without the influence of religion or the creator mythology. His standards are human and reactionary, based solely on the senses of “pleasure and pain", yet they are crucial and significant to his development. Analysis of John Donne's Poem, The Flea Essay - The Flea John Donne’s poems are similar in their content. They usually point out at same topics like love, lust, sex and religion; only they are dissimilar in the feelings they express.
Anyone seeking to mix church and state has failed to understand the nature and proper role of either. Being founded upon the principal that all men are created equal and deserving of equal protection under the law is what makes the American system of democracy such a gift to mankind.
To incorporate the inherently exclusionary imperatives of a particular religion into the determinedly inclusive system of the American constitutional form of government would be to undermine the very spirit of America by pushing it away from a democracy, and toward a theocracy.
And yet Paul whom, we should never forget, spent years zealously persecuting and having executed untold numbers of Christians must remain to us a mortal man. More than reasonable, it is incumbent upon those who claim to seek the deepest knowledge of Christ to subject the words of Paul to the same kinds of objective analysis we would the words of any man daring to describe the qualities, purposes and desires of God.
With regard to the written identity of God, the pronoun "he" is a necessity of the English language, not an actual anatomical designation. God is neither male nor female. God is large enough to contain and hold in balance any of the qualities one might assign to either. The Biblical scholarship supporting the idea that Paul never wrote a word proscribing natural homosexuality is at least as credible and persuasive as the scholarship if not the typical translations claiming that he did.
Any person who uses the words of Paul in the New Testament to "prove" that homosexuality is a sin against God has either never researched the matter, or has simply chosen to believe one set of equal proofs over another.
It is much more reasonable -- and certainly more compassionate -- to hold that throughout history God chose to introduce himself in different ways into different culture streams than it is to believe that there is only one correct way to understand and worship God, and that the punishment for anyone who chooses any but that way is to spend all of eternity having the living flesh seared off of his or her bones.
The only person who should be actively endeavoring to convert non-Christians into Christians is God. Jesus does not need our help drawing people toward him.
He does need our help -- or could certainly use it, anyway -- making sure that people know that they are loved. Getting a divorce is painful and if at all possible should certainly be avoided.
But ultimately the act in and of itself is certainly not immoral. God does not want any woman "submitting" to anyone. An all-powerful God and the theory of evolution are not incompatible. In a nutshell, I believe that Christ and Christianity are meant to be understood, appreciated and experienced as galvanizing inspirations for living a life of love, compassion, fairness, peace and humility.
Attempting to bend the glory of Jesus Christ toward anything else --especially toward the accrual of personal wealth or power -- is antithetical to what Jesus represented and died for.
To me, all of the above is just common sense.Learn how to use Decision Tree Analysis to choose between several courses of action. As with all Decision Making methods, decision tree analysis should be used in conjunction with common sense – decision trees are just one important part of your Decision Making toolkit.
Religious, cultural, and national self-images have an integrative function, helping to make an aggregate group of human beings into a collectivity with a common sense of purpose, and imparting identity and meaning to the lives of a people.
Thomas Paine's Common Sense was instrumental in shifting the argument from accommodation with Britain to outright independence for the American colonies.
Credit: Image courtesy of the Library of Congress..
Artist – Auguste Milliere, National Portrait Gallery, London. In an obscure immigrant. In Common Sense, Thomas Paine shows us that sometimes God will support violence if it's for a good reason. Common Sense shows us that Thomas Paine's apparently "common sense" argument relies heavily on his readers belief in the Christian Bible.
Common Sense. Download a PDF of Common Sense. Thomas Paine published Common Sense in January support of the Patriot cause.
Using clear, plain language, Paine rallied the colonists to support the break from Britain. To call their advocacy a tenet of religion is to offend the common sense of mankind.
If they are crimes, then to teach, advise and counsel their practice is to aid in their commission, and such teaching and counseling are themselves criminal and proper subjects of punishment, as aiding and abetting crime are in all other cases.''.