War and terrorism

The targeted elimination of US citizen and radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki for his alleged role as a terrorist affiliate raises troubling international legal questions.

War and terrorism

This article may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may interest only a particular audience. Please help by spinning off or relocating any relevant information, and removing excessive detail that may be against Wikipedia's inclusion policy. March This section needs attention from an expert in Law.

Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the section. WikiProject Law may be able to help recruit an expert. March Attack at the Bologna railway station on 2 August by the neo-fascist group Nuclei Armati Rivoluzionari.

| Define at ashio-midori.com

With 85 deaths, it is the deadliest massacre in the history of Italy as a Republic. There are over different definitions of terrorism. Experts and other long-established scholars in the field are equally incapable of reaching a consensus.

Coady has written that the question of how to define terrorism is "irresolvable" because "its natural home is in polemical, ideological and propagandist contexts". Revolutionary terror is not terrorism. To make a moral equivalence between the Revolution's year II and September is historical and philosophical nonsense.

The violence exercised on 11 September aimed neither at equality nor liberty. Nor did the preventive war announced by the president of the United States. Shock and Awe" as a subcategory of "rapid dominance" is the name given to massive intervention designed to strike terror into the minds of the enemy.

It is a form of state-terrorism. The concept was however developed long before the Second Gulf War by Harlan Ullman as chair of a forum of retired military personnel. These difficulties arise from the fact that the term "terrorism" is politically and emotionally charged.

During the s and s, the United Nations attempts to define the term floundered mainly due to differences of opinion between various members about the use of violence in the context of conflicts over national liberation and self-determination.

Sincethe United Nations General Assembly has repeatedly condemned terrorist acts using the following political description of terrorism: Criminal acts intended or calculated to provoke a state of terror in the public, a group of persons or particular persons for political purposes are in any circumstance unjustifiable, whatever the considerations of a political, philosophical, ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or any other nature that may be invoked to justify them.

Code Title 22 Chapter 38, Section f d defines terrorism as: Involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law; Appear to be intended i to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; ii to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or iii to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the U.

A definition proposed by Carsten Bockstette at the George C.

War and terrorism

Marshall European Center for Security Studiesunderlines the psychological and tactical aspects of terrorism: Terrorism is defined as political violence in an asymmetrical conflict that is designed to induce terror and psychic fear sometimes indiscriminate through the violent victimization and destruction of noncombatant targets sometimes iconic symbols.

Such acts are meant to send a message from an illicit clandestine organization. For example, carrying out a strategic bombing on an enemy city, which is designed to affect civilian support for a cause, would not be considered terrorism if it were authorized by a government.

This criterion is inherently problematic and is not universally accepted,[ attribution needed ] because: Controversies about labeling terrorism Having the moral charge in our vocabulary of 'something morally wrong', the term 'terrorism' is often used to abuse or denounce opposite parties, either governments or non-state-groups.

Jihadimujaheddinand fedayeen are similar Arabic words that have entered the English lexicon. It is common for both parties in a conflict to describe each other as terrorists. On one point, at least, everyone agrees: It is a word with intrinsically negative connotations that is generally applied to one's enemies and opponents, or to those with whom one disagrees and would otherwise prefer to ignore.

Use of the term implies a moral judgment; and if one party can successfully attach the label terrorist to its opponent, then it has indirectly persuaded others to adopt its moral viewpoint. If one identifies with the victim of the violence, for example, then the act is terrorism.

If, however, one identifies with the perpetrator, the violent act is regarded in a more sympathetic, if not positive or, at the worst, an ambivalent light; and it is not terrorism.

There is the famous statement: It assesses the validity of the cause when terrorism is an act. One can have a perfectly beautiful cause and yet if one commits terrorist acts, it is terrorism regardless.

Later, these same persons, as leaders of the liberated nations, are called "statesmen" by similar organizations.Brave New War: The Next Stage of Terrorism and the End of Globalization [John Robb] on ashio-midori.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.

For my money, John Robb, a former Air Force officer and tech guru, is the futurists' futurist. -- Slate The counterterrorism expert John Robb reveals how the same technology that has enabled globalization also allows terrorists and criminals to join forces.

Oct 25,  · Terrorism. The word “terrorism” derives from the Latin verb terreo, which literally means, “to frighten.”Today, the term “terrorism” indicates the killing of innocent civilians (and/or members of the government or of specific religious or ethnic groups) by non-governmental organizations.

The Iraq war was one such example, where among other things, the concern of terrorism was used to justify a war against Iraq, even though the terrorism links were not real.

From the above, we see that war is between willing participants, and terrorism is a more no-holds-barred approach to attacking an enemy. The act of terrorism .

War and terrorism

After the terrorist attacks of September 11, , the Bush administration declared a worldwide "war on terror," involving open and covert military operations, new security legislation, efforts to block the financing of terrorism, and more. The War on Terror, also known as the Global War on Terrorism, is an international military campaign that was launched by the United States government after the September 11 attacks against the United States.